THE STATE AS A SUBJECT OF COORDINATION IN THE INSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM OF THE X-TYPE

In the Belarusian economy, the state certainly plays a key role (and even several roles), however, without the functioning of markets reflecting the nature of a person and the nature of his relations in society, the future of an economic system devoid of material motives and incentives is seen as stagnant and unpromising. The article considers the theoretical aspects of the coordination of economic processes in relation to the X-type institutional system, in which it is required not only to reconcile different subjects in terms of goal-setting and priorities (state, population, business), but also to make their interaction constructive, coordinated, aimed at achieving both individual and public interests in the foreseeable and long-term future.

1. Rubinshteyn, A. Ya. (2019) Why are some theories not recognized, while others are successful? «Meritorious paternalism» of R. Musgrave and «Libertarian paternalism» of R. Thaler. Ekonomicheskiy jurnal VSHE. 23 (3), 345-364. (In Russian).

2. Zaostrovtsev, A. P., Matveev, V. V. (2024) Austrian school of economics: Fundamental principles, methodology, institutional analysis and perspectives. Voprosyi ekonomiki. (2), 67-83. (In Russian).

3. Van de Ven, A. H., Delbecq, A. L., Koenig, Jr. R. (1976) Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations. American Sociological Review. (41), 322-338.

4. Chandler, A. D. (1962) Strategy and structure. Cambridge, MIT Press.

5. Williamson, O. E. (1981) The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes. Journal of Economic Literature. XIX, 1537-1568.

6. Fedorov, S. I. (2023) The influence of political power on models of industrial organization: Institutional approach. Obschestvennyie nauki i sovremennost. (1), 101-120. (In Russian).

7. Adler, P. S. (1995) Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface. Organization Science. 6 (2), 147-167.

8. Lunenburg, F. C. (2012) Organizational Structure: Mintzberg’s Framework. International Journal of Scholarly, Academic, Intellectual Diversity. 14 (1), 1-8.

9. Parinov, S. I. (2023) Micro level of economic coordination processes. Voprosyi ekonomiki. (2), 127-144. (In Russian).

10. Shevchuk, A. V. (2022) Labor and power in the Russian model of platform capitalism. Sotsiologiya vlasti. 34 (3-4), 128-155. (In Russian).

11. Lavrova, O. I. (2024) The interaction of different institutional systems and economies: in search of efficiency. Belaruskaya dumka. (3), 64-72. (In Russian).

12. Piketti, T. (2023) Kapital v XXI veke [Capital in the 21st century] Moscow, Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian).