Assessment of organizational readiness for the digital transformation of human resource management: a model and an express diagnostic tool
https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-6667-2026-23-52-65
Abstract
The digital transformation of human resource management is becoming one of the key areas for improving organizational efficiency, but its success is largely determined by the initial willingness of the HR function to change. Research by international authors suggests models of digital business maturity, organizational readiness for change and the introduction of e-HRM solutions, but does not fully take into account the specifics of human resource management as an independent object of transformation.
The purpose of this study is to develop a model for assessing an organization's readiness for the digital transformation of human resource management and to form an express diagnostic tool for it.
The methodological basis of the study was a systematic approach, the provisions of the theory of organizational readiness for change, the concepts of digital maturity and a comparative analysis of existing models for assessing readiness for digital transformation. As a result, a diagnostic model is proposed that includes technological, competence, organizational, cultural, and institutional-legal blocks. For the practical application of the model, an express diagnostic sheet, a self-assessment questionnaire, a scale of interpretation of the results, and a typology of the overall maturity profiles of the organization have been developed.
The scientific novelty of the research lies in the adaptation of the logic of digital maturity assessment to the tasks of digital transformation of the HR function and integration into a single diagnostic system of not only technological, but also competence, cultural and legal parameters.
The practical significance of the work lies in the possibility of using the proposed tool for a preliminary assessment of the initial conditions of the digital transformation of HRM, identification of limiting factors and identification of priority areas of management impact.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. V. VankevichBelarus
Alena V. Vankevich, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Professor at the Department
Department of Economics and Electronic Business
210039; Moskovsky Ave., 72; Vitebsk
I. N. Kalinouskaya
Belarus
Irina N. Kalinouskaya, Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor
Department of Economics and Electronic Business
210039; Moskovsky Ave., 72; Vitebsk
References
1. Vankevich А. V. (2024). Modern tools for staffing the textile industry of the Republic of Belarus. Izvestiya vy`sshix uchebny`x zavedenij. Texnologiya tekstil`noj promy`shlennosti. 6(414), 108–117. (In Russ.).
2. Kalinouskaya I. N. (2024) Analysis of trends in the digital transformation of human resource management in organizations of the Vitebsk region. Vestnik Vitebskogo gosudarstvennogo texnologicheskogo universiteta. 1(47), 122–140. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24412/2079-7958-2024-1-122-140
3. Armenakis A. A., Harris S. G., Mossholder K. W. (1993). Creating Readiness for Organizational Change. Human Relations. 46(6), 681–704. doi: 10.1177/001872679304600601
4. Bersin J. (2019). HR Technology Market 2019: Disruption Ahead. Josh Bersin Academy Research Report.
5. Bersin J., Agarwal K., Pelster B., Schwartz J. (2017). The Digital HR Maturity Model. Deloitte Insights.
6. Cameron K. S., Quinn R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. 3<sup>rd</sup> ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Chandler A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Esen M., Ozbag G. K. (2014). An investigation of the effects of organizational readiness on technology acceptance in e-HRM applications. International Journal of Human Resource Studies. 4(1), 232–247. doi: 10.5296/ijhrs.v4i1.5643
9. Hammer M. (1990). Reengineering Work: Don't Automate, Obliterate. Harvard Business Review. 68(4), 104–112.
10. Judge W. Q., Douglas T. J. (2008). Organizational Capacity for Change and Strategic Ambidexterity: Flying the Plane While Rewiring It. European Journal of Marketing. 43(1/2), 915–926. doi: 10.1108/03090560810891073
11. Kotter J. P. (1995). Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail. Harvard Business Review. 73(2), 59–67.
12. Lewin K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper & Row.
13. North D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511808678
14. Rafferty A. E., Jimmieson N. L., Armenakis A. A. (2013). Change Readiness : A Multilevel Review. Journal of Management. 39(1), 110–135. doi: 10.1177/0149206312457417
15. Rogers E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. 5<sup>th</sup> ed. New York: Free Press.
16. Schein E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership. 4<sup>th</sup> ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Tabrizi B., Lam E., Girard K., Irvin V. (2019). Digital Transformation Is Not About Technology. Harvard Business Review. March 13.
18. Teece D. J. (2007). Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal. 28(13), 1319–1350. doi: 10.1002/smj.640
19. Vankevich А. V., Kalinouskaya I. N. (2024). Digitalisation and jobs: The case of organisations in the Vitebsk area of Belarus. Journal of New Economy. 25(4), 106–126.
20. Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly. 27(3), 425–478. doi: 10.2307/30036540
21. Weiner B. J. (2009). A Theory of Organizational Readiness for Change. Implementation Science. 4, 67.
22. Williamson O. E. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature. 38(3), 595–613. doi: 10.1257/jel.38.3.595
Review
For citations:
Vankevich A.V., Kalinouskaya I.N. Assessment of organizational readiness for the digital transformation of human resource management: a model and an express diagnostic tool. Economic Science Today. 2026;(23):52-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-6667-2026-23-52-65
JATS XML
