Knowledge intensity in sectoral economics

   In the context of innovative production and the development of the knowledge economy, the functioning of economic systems at various levels, including both the private and public sectors, is largely determined by a critical characteristic: knowledge intensity. This article conceptualizes knowledge intensity as an integrated characteristic that captures the influence of diverse processes, phenomena, and indicators. It demonstrates the role of bidirectional influence and convergence among theoretical, sectoral, functional, and spatial economics in an increase in knowledge intensity within
an economy. It also proposes a system of indicators for assessing knowledge intensity.

   Particular emphasis is placed on adopting an integrated approach to the systemic support of knowledge intensity growth, encompassing various types of support: research-based, labor-related, informational, technological, legal, financial, and organizational.

   Achieving growth in knowledge intensity requires the collaboration of diverse specialists, from theoretical researchers to applied practitioners. Increasing knowledge intensity in the economy generates a multiplier effect across industries and regions, owing to its positive impact on the development of related sectors and neighboring regions.

1. Agasisti T., Bertoletti A. (2022) Higher education and economic growth: A longitudinal study of European regions 2000–2017. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 81, 100940. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100940

2. Anfalova A. V. (2025). Impact of artificial intelligence on work and its regulatory policy in Russia. Russian Journal of Labour Economics. 12(3), 249–266. doi: 10.18334/et.12.3.122795

3. Antonelli C., Pialli G. (2023). The knowledge-intensive direction of technological change. Eurasian Business Review. (13), 1-2. doi: 10.1007/s40821-022-00234-z

4. Antonyuk V. S., Kornienko E. L., Vansovich E. R. (2020). The spatial development patterns of the Russian Federation productive forces in the current context. Russian Journal of Economic Theory. 17(2), 314–327. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31063/2073-6517/2020.17-2.6

5. Cherepovitsyn A. E., Tretyakov N. A. (2023). Development of a new assessment system for the applicability of digital projects in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Mining Institute. 262, 628–642. (In Russ.).

6. Criscuolo C., Gonne N., Kitazawa K., Lalanne G. (2022). Are industrial policy instruments effective? A review of the evidence in OECD countries. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers. (128). doi: 10.1787/57b3dae2-en

7. Dubey R., Gunasekaran A., Childe S. J., Bryde D. J., Giannakis M., Foropon C., Roubaud D., Hazen B. T. (2020). Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: A study of manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Production Economics. 226, 107599. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107599

8. Dushin A. V., Yurak V. V., Vlasov I. A. (2025). Digital core: A study of key research centers in Russia. National Environmental, Economic and Social Interests in the Era of Great Challenges : Proceedings of the XVIII International Research-to-Practice Conference of the Russian Society for Environmental Economics. Apatity, June 30 to July 5, 2025. Apatity, KSC RAS. Pp. 199–204. (In Russ.).

9. Ergin S. M., Kopaenko I. V. (2022). Challenges and opportunities of business infrastructure information support amidst digitalization. Creative Economy. 16(1), 77–92. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18334/ce.16.1.114097

10. Fierro L. E., Caiani A., Russo A. (2022). Automation, job polarisation, and structural change. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 200, 499–535. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.05.025

11. Gartner J., Maresch D., Tierney R. (2024). The key to scaling in the digital era: Simultaneous automation, individualization and interdisciplinarity. Journal of Small Business Management. 62(2), 628–655. doi: 10.1080/00472778.2022.2073361

12. Glebova E. V., Volokhina A. T., Vikhrov A. E. (2023). Assessment of the efficiency of occupational safety culture management in fuel and energy companies. (In Russ.). Journal of Mining Institute. 259, 68–78. doi: 10.31897/PMI.2023.12

13. Korchagova L. A., Korchagov S. A. (2018). Impact of science-intensity and innovations on the development of Russian economy. RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law. 3, 64–76. (In Russ.). doi: 10.28995/2073-6304-2018-3-64-76

14. Kurniasari F., Abd Hamid N., Lestari E. D. (2025). Unraveling the impact of financial literacy, financial technology adoption, and access to finance on small medium enterprises business performance and sustainability: A serial mediation model. Cogent Business & Management. 12(1), 2487837. doi: 10.1080/23311975.2025.2487837

15. Larichkin F. D., Cherepovitsyn A. E., Fedoseev S. V., Knysh V. A., Fadeev A. M., Berezikov S. A. (2024). The main stages of formation and development of the concept of integrated use of mineral raw materials and integrated development of subsoil resources (IUMRM/IDSR). Topical Issues in Economics and Management : Proceedings of the Twelfth All-Russian Research-to-Practice Conference. Yekaterinburg, Ural State Mining University. Pp. 385–390. (In Russ.).

16. Litvinenko V. S., Petrov E. I., Vasilevskaya D. V., Yakovenko A. V., Naumov I. A., Ratnikov M. A. (2023). Assessment of the role of the state in the management of mineral resources. Journal of Mining Institute. (259), 95–111. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31897/PMI.2022.100

17. Lozhko V. V., Khaykin M. M. (2023). Problemy razvitiya sotsial’nykh i ekonomicheskikh sistem v usloviyakh sovremennykh tsivilizatsionnykh protsessov [Problems of the Development of Social and Economic Systems in the Context of Modern Civilization Processes]. St. Petersburg, Asterion. (In Russ.). doi: 10.53115/9785001883982

18. Matrokhina K. V., Trofimets V. Y., Mazakov E. B., Makhovikov A. B., Khaykin M. M. (2023). Development of methodology for scenario analysis of investment projects of enterprises of the mineral resource complex. Journal of Mining Institute. 259, 112–124. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31897/PMI.2023.3

19. Mondolo J. (2022). The composite link between technological change and employment: A survey of the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys. (36), 1027–1068. doi: 10.1111/joes.12469

20. Novikov S. V. (2023). Adaptive management of higher education through the integration of education, science and production. Tendentsii razvitiya nauki i obrazovaniya. 101, 55–59. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18411/trnio-09-2023-70

21. O chem dumayut ekonomisty: Besedy s nobelevskimi laureatami [Inside the Economist’s Mind: Conversations with Eminent Economists / ed. by Paul A. Samuelson and William A. Barnett] (2009). Moscow, Skolkovo, Alpina Business Book. (In Russ.).

22. O’Dwyer M., Filieri R., O’Malley L. (2023). Establishing successful university–industry collaborations: Barriers and enablers deconstructed. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 48, 900–931. doi: 10.1007/s10961-022-09932-2

23. Plechero M., Grillitsch M. (2023). Advancing innovation in manufacturing firms: Knowledge base combinations in a local productive system. European Planning Studies. 31(6), 1247–1269. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2022.2122705

24. Pujol-Jover M., Duque L. C., Riera-Prunera M. C. (2023). The recruit requirements of recent graduates: Approaching the existing mismatch. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. 34(1-2), 57–70. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2022.2029695

25. Rousseau D. M., ten Have S. (2022). Evidence-based change management. Organizational Dynamics. 51(3), 100899. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2022.100899

26. Shahmoradi B., Bagheri A. (2025). Unlocking innovation: The economic impact of R&D tax credit policies. Journal of Tax Reform. 11(2), 341–357. doi: 10.15826/jtr.2025.11.2.205

27. Sun L., Lu F., Guan H., Lu X., Zhai J., Liu J. (2025). Tax incentives, business environment, and entrepreneurial and innovation outcome. International Review of Financial Analysis. 103, 104154. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104154

28. Tel’nova N. V., Orel Y. V., Gracheva D. O. (2023). The role of innovations in sustainable economic development. Russian Journal of Management. 11(4), 501–510. (In Russ.). doi: 10.29039/2409-6024-2023-11-4-501-510

29. Tolstyh T. O., Morgunova M. K. (2024). Current trends in the development of knowledge-intensive companies amidst systemic challenges. High-Tech Enterprises Economy. 5(2), 109–118. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18334/evp.5.2.121339

30. Tsvetkov P. S. (2025). Cluster approach for industrial CO₂ capture and transport: Savings via shared infrastructure. Journal of Mining Institute. (275), 110–129. (In Russ.).

31. Zhang Q., Sun X., Zhang M. (2022). Data matters: A strategic action framework for data governance. Information & Management. 59(4), 103642. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2022.103642

32. Zhuang T., Shi J. (2024). Engagement, determinants and challenges: A multinational systematic review of education-focused university-industry collaborations. Educational Review. 76(5), 1363–1391. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2022.2149701

33. Zhukovskiy Y. L., Beloglazov I. I., Klebanov D. A., Temkin I. O. (2025). Editorial: Digital transformation in process and equipment management at fuel and energy complex and mineral resources companies. Journal of Mining Institute. (275), 3–4. (In Russ.).