Preview

Economic Science Today

Advanced search

JEVONSON PARADOX, ENERGY SECURITY EFFECT AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES INDUSTRIALIZATION EFFECT AS DRIVERS OF COAL INDUSTRY GROWTH

https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-6667-2025-22-160-170

Abstract

This article examines the growth of the coal industry in the 21st century. Despite the development of diverse energy sources, including renewable ones, coal remains a key energy resource in the global energy mix, accounting for more than a third of the energy balance. This phenomenon is partly due to the Jevons paradox (rebound effect), which, however, cannot explain new surge in coal production, consumption, and trade (reaching a record in 2024), including in countries that have consistently reduced coal production and consumption over recent decades (the United States and Europe), given the absence of radical technological change. The article argues that energy security effect and developing countries industrial-ization effect are no less important factors in the coal industry's growth than the rebound effect.

About the Author

Jianhui Ding
Belarusian National Technical University
Belarus

Postgraduate student of the Department “Economics and Law”

Minsk



References

1. Jevons, W. S. (1866) The Coal Question. London, England: Macmillan and Company. 2. Khazzoom, J. D. (1989) Energy savings from more efficient appliances: a rejoinder. Energy Journal. (10), 157-166.

2. Brookes, L. (1990) The greenhouse effect: the fallacies in the energy efficiency solution. Energy Policy. (18), 199-201.

3. Saunders, H. D. (1992) The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. Energy Journal. 13 (4), 131-148. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol13-No4-7

4. Lange, S. [et al.] (2021) The Jevons paradox unravelled: A multi-level typology of rebound effects and mechanisms. Energy Research & Social Science. (74). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101982

5. Barker, T., Dagoumas, A., Rubin, J. (2009) The macroeconomic rebound effect and

6. the world economy. Energy Efficiency. (2), 411-427. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-009-9053-y

7. Hecking, H. (2016) Twenty-first century, the century of coal? CO 2 prices to curb coal demand. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 32 (2), 260-281. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grw011

8. Zhang, J., Liu, X.-f. (2025) Sustainable development at the crossroads: Geopolitical risks, natural resource scarcity, and renewable energy in energy security transitions. Geoscience Frontiers. 16 (5). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2025.102129.

9. Aydin, M. [et al.] (2025) Analyzing the impact of environmental technological regulations, energy security, and natural resources on energy intensity in the USA. Energy Reports. (14), 500-507. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.06.013

10. Anthoff, D., Hahn, R. (2010) Government failure and market failure: on the inefficiency of environmental and energy policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 26 (2), 197-224. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grq004

11. Polovyan, A. V., Shemyakina, N. V., Grinevskaya, S. N. (2021) Donbass coal industry development trends. Vestnik Instituta Jekonomicheskih Issledovanij. 2 (22), 5-20. (in Russian).

12. Solodovnikov, S. Yu. [et al.] (2025) Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Green Natural Resources Use in China and Belarus in the Context of National Security. Finance, Economics, and Industry for Sustainable Development, Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. 621-531. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87752-0_31

13. Lyu, X. [et al.] (2024) The differentiated adoption of green planting technology by farmers and its influencing factors: the case from Juxian County, China. Environment Development and Sustainability. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05370-2

14. Rumyantseva, A., Solodovnikov, S. Yu., Skoraya, K. V. (2024) Evolution of the Idea and Practice of Sustainable Development. Finance, Economics, and Industry for Sustainable Development. 573-581. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56380-5_51

15. Solodovnikov, S. Yu. [et al.] (2024) New Regionalization and Evolution of the Concept of “Environmental Safety”. Finance, Economics, and Industry for Sustainable Development. 551-560. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56380-5_49

16. Crawley, G. M. (2016) Fossil Fuels. Current Status and Future Directions. Gerard M Crawley, 372. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1142/9698

17. Pang, L. [et al.] (2024) How does natural resource depletion affect energy security risk? New insights from major energy-consuming countries. Energy Strategy Reviews. 54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101460


Review

For citations:


Ding J. JEVONSON PARADOX, ENERGY SECURITY EFFECT AND DEVELOPING COUNTRIES INDUSTRIALIZATION EFFECT AS DRIVERS OF COAL INDUSTRY GROWTH. Economic Science Today. 2025;(22):160-170. https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-6667-2025-22-160-170

Views: 141

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2309-6667 (Print)